Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Celebrezze

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1963No. 2086PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAVEN, Chief Judge.

Kelly Cunningham, on May 2, 1960, filed an application for disability benefits under Section 223 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.A. § 423) and for the establishment of a period of disability under Section. 216(i) of the Act (42 U.S. C.A. § 416(i)). The Examiner entered a finding that on the record before him Cunningham was not under a disability as contemplated by the Act and was not, therefore, entitled to any benefits. The Appeals Council refused to review the Examiner’s decision.

*620In order for the claimant to become entitled to disability benefits under the Act, it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Carl G. Underwood, (Social Security Account Number Tqv-Im-Bnsb v. Abraham A. Ribicoff, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  3. Charles W. Teeter v. Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  4. Pope v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1962
  5. Roop v. FlemmingDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bethune v. FinchDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1969
  2. Fowler v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1963
  3. Hudson v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API