Automatic Sprinkler Corp. v. Southern California Edison Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TODD, Acting P. J.
Automatic Sprinkler Corporation of America, a division of Figgie International, Inc. (Automatic), appeals after the trial court granted a summary judgment for Southern California Edison Company (Edison) in Automatic’s action to enforce a mechanic’s lien and to impose liability on Edison for failing to require its general contractor on the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) to post a payment bond as required for public entities in the construction of public works pursuant to Civil Code section 3247.
Automatic contends the summary judgment was erroneously…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Hutnick v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Insurance Co. of the West v. Haralambos Beverage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Petersen v. W. T. Grant Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- States Shingle Co. v. KaufmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Virgil Barham v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Gayle Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Federal Savings And Loan Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Koudmani v. Ogle Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Gayle Manufacturing Co. v. Federal Savings & Loan InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- L.A.M. Construction, Inc. v. KrizAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1993