Legal Opinion
Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Rexall Sundown, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 19, 2008No. 03-CV-6620TPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION & ORDER
MARIAN W. PAYSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated commenced this patent infringement lawsuit in December 2003, alleging that defendants Rexall Sundown, Inc., Rexall, Inc. and NBTY, Inc. (collectively, “Rexall”) have infringed its patent pertaining to compositions for nutritional supplements used in the prevention and treatment of visual acuity loss, United States Patent No. 6,660,297 (“the '297 patent”). (Docket # 1). Specifically, the Complaint alleges that defendants infringed the '297 patent by manufacturing, marketing and selling a product…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Gould v. Control Laser Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Xerox Corp. v. 3Com Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- United Sweetener USA, Inc. v. Nutrasweet Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1991
- GPAC, Inc. v. D.W.W. Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spread Spectrum Screening LLC v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 2011
- Roblor Marketing Group, Inc. v. GPS Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
- Document Dynamics, LLC v. Xerox CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
- Heinz Kettler GMBH & Co. v. Indian Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- Invictus Lighting LLC v. RAB Lighting, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.