Legal Opinion
Pedro v. Pedro
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 20, 1990No. C6-90-814PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Respondent Alfred Pedro commenced this action against appellants Carl Pedro, Jr., Eugene Pedro and the Pedro Companies (TPC), seeking dissolution of TPC; appointment of a receiver; damages for lost wages; infliction of emotional distress and slander; and an award of attorney fees. Appellants counterclaimed for breach of fiduciary duty, mismanagement and waste of corporate property. The trial court submitted the controversy to the jury as a buyout of respondent’s shares of stock in TPC. The jury found the Stock Retirement Agreement to be valid and controlling of the buyout…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Eklund v. Vincent Brass and Aluminum Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Evans v. BlesiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- O'Keefe v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- In Re Estate of MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McCALLUM v. ROSEN'S DIVERSIFIED, INC.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Piekarski v. Home Owners Sav. Bank, FSBDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Lund v. LundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- William B. McCallum v. Rosen's DiversifiedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Blum v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.