Legal Opinion

Gibbons v. Gibbons

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 1, 1936PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a final decree dismissing his bill after the entry of an interlocutory decree sustaining a demurrer thereto. Although no appeal from the interlocutory decree was taken, its correctness is open for consideration upon the appeal from the final decree. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 214, § 27. Nochemson v. Aronson, 279 Mass. 278, 280. See also Carleton & Hovey Co. v. Burns, *90285 Mass. 479, 484; Canning’s Case, 283 Mass. 196, 199; Arwshan v. Meshaka, 288 Mass. 31, 34.

The bill alleges that in 1930, at the solicitation of the defendant, his wife, the plaintiff caused savings accounts in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chippendale v. North Adams Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Goldston v. RandolphMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Weidman v. WeidmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Marble v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Palmer Savings Bank v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Dodge v. Anna Jaques HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Berry v. KyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Kenyon v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  5. Weiner v. Pictorial Paper Package Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API