Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Gordon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1945PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

We said on the former appeal that the common carrier was entitled to a hearing on its petition. Has this been accorded ? The appellant says not, as the matter was determined on counter-motions based on the record in the criminal case, to which it was not a party.

It is provided by G. S., 18-6, that when any officer of the law shall discover any person in this State in the act of transporting, in violation of law, intoxicating liquor in any wagon, buggy, automobile, water or air craft, or other vehicle, “it shall be his duty to seize any and all intoxicating liquor found therein being…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Duckworth v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Carter v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. State v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holm v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Shepherd v. ShepherdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. In Re the Custody of GuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. In Re GibbonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. In Re NelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API