Wheelock v. Heath
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Spencer, C. J., Pro Tem.
These actions are brought under sections 57-228 through 57-231, R. R. S. 1943, to extinguish the severed mineral interests owned of record by the defendants, and to vest the title to them in the plaintiffs. The trial court canceled the interests and vested title in plaintiffs. The question presented is the constitutionality of the act as retroactively applied against these defendants. We reverse.
The statutory provisions pertinent herein, all of which became effective in 1967, are as follows:
Section 57-228, R. R. S. 1943: “Any owner or owners of the surface of real…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Williamson v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
- Farmers Canal Co. v. FrankNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- Stoller v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- Fawn Lake Ranch Co. v. CumbowNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
- Retired City Civilian Employees Club v. City of Omaha Employees Retirement SystemNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Van Slooten v. LarsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Wilson v. Marceil GreenHalgh BishopIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Young v. Dodge County Board of SupervisorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Moore v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.