Legal Opinion

Moore v. Peterson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1984No. 83-395PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

The director of the Department of Motor Vehicles appeals from the judgment of the district court reversing the order of the director revoking the operator’s license and operating privileges of the plaintiff, Keith J. Moore, for 6 months from August 30, 1982, for refusal to submit to a test of body fluids pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.08 (Reissue 1978) of Nebraska’s implied consent law.

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15 (Reissue 1978) requires the arresting officer to make a “sworn report” to the director concerning the arrest and refusal of the arrested person to submit to the required test.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION, DEPT.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Wheelock v. HeathNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. HowardNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Schoultz v. Department of Motor VehiclesWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. McLeod v. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  2. Young v. Dodge County Board of SupervisorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. Von DornNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Welsh v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Larson v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API