Legal Opinion

Prudential Petroleum Corp. v. Rauscher, Pierce & Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 3, 1955No. 14933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Justice.

This suit was instituted by appellee against appellant Corporation for an alleged conversion of corporate stock; charging that the latter had unlawfully refused to transfer on its books a certificate for 1,000 shares of Company stock, which number of shares had been sold by plaintiff as agent for Paul E. Bell to Stanley Pelz & Co., Inc., New York City. An interlocutory judgment by default was rendered against Bell, also named a defendant; and upon trial to the court after overruling of exceptions, judgment was likewise rendered against the Petroleum concern for $950, which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kinzbach Tool Co. v. Corbett-Wallace Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Baker v. WassonTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Bower v. Yellow Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Gresham v. Island City Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  5. Hulse v. Consolidated Quicksilver Mining Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Earthman's, Inc. v. EarthmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. ARTHUR W. TIFFORD, PA v. Tandem Energy Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  3. Zodiac Corp. v. General Electric Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Service Finance v. Adriatic Ins. Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  5. Edina State Bank v. Mr. Steak, Inc., and Central Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API