Legal Opinion

Scheible v. Law

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Erom the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit by the appellee, against Scheible and Scheible, to recover damages occasioned by an alleged nuisance, and to procure the abatement of the same.

¥e copy the main portions of the complaint:

“ The plaintiff, Joel Law, complains of Jacob M. Scheible and George C. Scheible, and says that the plaintiff, Joel Law, is now, and has been for many years last past, to wit, since the -day of -, 1861, seized in fee of the following described real estate, to wit: The north half of the north-east quarter of section thirty-two (32), in township twelve (12), range six (6) east, and that the defendants are,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bellefontaine Railway Co. v. HunterIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Pettis v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Manning v. GasharieIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Haag v. Board of Comm'rs of Vanderburgh Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Amidon v. GaffIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Krutz v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Shuck v. State ex rel. CopeIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Byram v. GalbraithIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. North-Western Mutual Fire Insurance v. BlankenshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API