Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. English v. Multnomah County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 2010No. CC 070708042; CA A137217; SC S057387PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBalivie R, J.

This mandamus action requires us to determine the effect of a final judgment, containing a “money award,” that was entered “pursuant to” Measure 37, a land use statute that applies here but that has now been substantially superseded by later legislation. Dorothy English, an owner of land in Multnomah County, filed a cause of action under Measure 37 against the county, ultimately obtaining a judgment “against [the county] for just compensation pursuant to the provisions of [Measure 37] in the sum of $1,150,000.” Although the county initially appealed that judgment, it later dismissed its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Buck v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Corey v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Peterson v. TempleOregon Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Bowers v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Portland General Electric Co. v. Ebasco Services, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Hoekstre v. STATE EX REL. DLCDCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Ram Technical Services, Inc. v. KoreskoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API