Legal Opinion

Robinson v. King

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1984No. 8320SC423PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

I. Applicable Law

The rights of the parties depend upon whether the quitclaim deed to Maggie Robinson conveyed a life estate or a fee simple. The deed is ambiguous. The granting clause gives all right, title, and interest to Maggie Robinson, while the habendum clause gives her the land “for and during the term of her natural life.”

Ambiguous deeds traditionally have been construed by the courts according to rules of construction, rather than by having juries determine factual questions of intent. The current governing rule is as follows:

In construing a conveyance executed after…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Rowland v. . RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. Artis v. . ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Seawell v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Oxendine v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. Black Dog Realty, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Mason-Reel v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Hornets Nest Girl Scout Council, Inc. v. Cannon Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Prelaz v. Town of CantonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. Irvine v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API