Legal Opinion
VIVAS
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1977No. ID 2544PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #2544 MATTER OF V1VA.S In Deportation Proceedings A-34580254 Decided by Board December 17, 1.977 (1) While the Service has the burden of proof to establish deportability by clear, convinc- ing and unequivocal evidence, a respondent in deportation proceedings may be required to go forward with the evidence when the Service has made a prima facie case and respondent has better control or knowledge of the evidence (in this instance, the proper identity of his alleged United States citizen wife). (2) Respondent's deportability as an alien excludable at entry under section…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. FleischmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Rossi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. John LakeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- B. J. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary v. James E. BrowderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- S-M-JBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
- O-DBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1998
- Barradas v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- C-A-LBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
- Raul Barradas v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009