Legal Opinion
Barradas v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 23, 2009No. 08-3440PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TINDER, Circuit Judge.
Raul Barradas, a Mexican citizen and lawful permanent resident of the United States, was found removable from the United States on the grounds that he knowingly attempted to smuggle illegal aliens into the country. He appealed the decision of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) to the Board of Immigration Appeals, which affirmed. Barradas now petitions this court for relief, arguing that the IJ incorrectly concluded that the government met its heavy burden of proof, improperly admitted evidence without allowing him the opportunity to cross-examine its preparer, and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ramiro Cruz Espinoza v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Yang v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Adrian Kerciku and Najada Kerciku v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, and John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Zamora-Mallari v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Elizabeth Lona v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Long-Gang Lin v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Delgado v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Maria Pouhova v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Gustavo Dominguez-Pulido v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.