Legal Opinion

W. J. Howard & Sons, Inc. v. Meyer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1962No. Docket 5, Calendar 49,183PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, C. J.

Defendant in this case, being- the owner of a farmhouse in Novi township, Oakland county, Michigan, desired to remodel it. To that end he employed an architect, Norman Simmons, to prepare plans therefor. Because of the nature of the project, and the unknown factors that might develop in the course of the operation, no specifications were prepared. In accordance with the advice of the architect, plaintiff corporation was selected as the contractor. Plaintiff had previously done work for Simmons and also for a company owned by defendant. In the absence of specifications it was determined that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wildey v. Fractional School District Number OneMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Davis v. Kramer Bros. Freight Lines, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Township of Zilwaukee v. Saginaw-Bay City Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Kellogg v. Kellogg Toasted Corn Flake Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Strom-Johnson Construction Co. v. Riverview Furniture StoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Gaydos v. White Motor Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Sam Levitz Furniture Co. v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Redinger v. Standard Oil CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API