Legal Opinion
Probasco v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided February 11, 2002No. 00-1441PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MIHM, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Defendant, Ford Motor Company (“Ford”). For the following reasons, the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART [# 14],
JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction over the above-styled matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1) and (c)(1) as the Plaintiff is a citizen of Iowa and the Defendant a citizen of Michigan (Ford is incorporated under the laws of Michigan and has its principal place of business in the same state). 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (West 1993).
BACKGROUND
On December 20, 1998, while…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wendorf v. LandersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Smizer v. DreySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Interclaim Holdings Ltd. v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & PooleDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Dewick v. Maytag Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Kutz v. NGI Capital, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2023