Interclaim Holdings Ltd. v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PALLMEYER, District Judge.
Interclaim Holdings Limited and Inter-claim Recovery Limited (“Interclaim”) is in the business of identifying, tracing, and freezing assets that have been laundered by financial criminals, and then getting those assets liquidated and distributed as restitution to the criminals’ victims and as compensation to Interclaim. In this case, Interclaim retained the law firm of Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole (“Ness Motley”) to bring class action proceedings on behalf of victims of a complex criminal network run by James Blair Down…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Mid-America Tablewares, Inc. v. Mogi Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Midland Fumigant, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Amakua Development LLC v. WarnerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Facility Wizard Software, Inc. v. Southeastern Technical Services, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Interclaim (Bermuda) Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Johnson v. Diakon LogisticsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021