Legal Opinion
Browning v. Hirsch
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 13, 1953No. 34486PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
The act of 1952 (Ga. L. 1952, p. 243) amended Code § 81-1001 by adding thereto the following provision: “Where the court sustains any or all demurrers to pleading, and allows time for the filing of an amendment, such judgment or order shall not be subject to exception or review, but the court shall render a judgment on the sufficiency of the pleadings after the expiration of the time allowed for amendment which shall supersede the judgment allowing time for amendment. Parties shall have the right to amend at any time prior to the rendition of such latter judgment. Nothing herein shall be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Freeman v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Lytle v. DeVaughnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Graham v. PhinizySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Long v. StanleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Ervin v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Adams v. RicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Aiken v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Rogers v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- McConnell v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Deese v. City of DublinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.