Legal Opinion
Norton v. Hamilton
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 22, 1955No. 35607PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.
“Where, in ruling upon demurrers, the trial court allows time for the filing of an amendment, such court shall render a judgment on the sufficiency of the pleadings after the expiration of the time allowed for amendment which shall supersede the earlier judgment on the demurrers, and such earlier judgment or judgments shall not be subject to exception or review.” Weinstein v. Rothberg, 87 Ga. App. 94 (73 S. E. 2d 106); Sutton v. Wilson, 87 Ga. App. 398 (74 S. E. 2d 15); Sellers v. City of Summerville, 88 Ga. App. 109 (76 S. E. 2d 99); Aiken v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 88 Ga.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Weinstein v. RothbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Sellers v. City of SummervilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Aiken v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Sutton v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
3Cited by5 opinions
- Myers v. GrantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Jacoby v. JacobySupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- United Jewelers, Inc. v. Emanuel Burton Diamond Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Stuart v. BerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957