Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Inquirer Co. v. Coe

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 15, 1941No. 6271PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

The question to be decided in this case is whether the Philadelphia Inquirer Company (a newspaper publisher) is entitled to federal registration of the trade-mark “Everybody’s Weekly” for a “weekly newspaper section”. The mark was rejected by the Examiner in the Patent Office, and also by the Commissioner on an ex parte appeal to him, on the ground of prior ownership and use of the same mark by a British weekly magazine.

There are no jurisdictional or procedural questions raised in the case. It is conceded that the application for registration was duly conducted in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Beech-Nut Packing Co. v. P. Lorillard Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. United States Ex Rel. Baldwin Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. HockmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  5. United States Printing & Lithograph Co. v. Griggs, Cooper & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Application of Laskin Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  2. Salem Commodities, Incorporated v. The Miami Margarine CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  3. Philadelphia Inquirer Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  4. Viscol Co. v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API