Legal Opinion

Kwong How v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 31, 1934No. 7327PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.

The appellants, Kwong How and Loo Choo were, on the 5th day of June, 1933, separately indicted for violation of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act, § 9 (26 USCA § 705), and the Jones-Miller Act, § I (2L USCA § 174). By stipulation of counsel the two cases were tried at the same time and before the same jury. Appellant Kwong How was indicted on five counts, and was found guilty only as to count 3, which charged that the defendant did unlawfully receive and conceal and did assist in receiving and concealing narcotic drugs, illegally imported into the United States, etc.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Stacey v. EmerySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. McCarthy v. De ArmitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  5. Garske v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Rhinelda M. Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  3. Papani v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  4. Harry T. Von Eichelberger and Haig Mihram Terzian v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  5. Mullaney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API