Legal Opinion
Solar Electric Corp. v. General Electric Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 2, 1957No. Civ. A. 14157PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff in its brief says the instant case is a treble damage action brought under Section 7 of the Sherman Act and Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15 and note, against General Electric and Sylvania to recover damages for injury to plaintiff’s business, suffered by plaintiff as the result of certain judicially established violations of the antitrust laws by the defendants, General Electric and Sylvania, all as more fully specified in the Amended Complaint.
The Complaint was filed January 4, 1956. An Amended Complaint was filed July 10, 1956. Responsive…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Sarnoff v. CiagliaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Thompson v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Vines v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Artvale, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent v. Rugby Fabrics Corp. And Barmil Associates, Ltd., Defendants-Respondents-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Dura Electric Lamp Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Dale Hilton, Inc. v. Triangle Publications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Winchester Drive-In Theatre, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.