Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Quesenberry

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1964No. 7336PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARMODY, Justice.

This is an appeal by the state from the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring payment of a stipulated'judgment entered in a condemnation proceeding. There is no appeal from the judgment itself, and reference is made to the former opinion denying a motion to dismiss, which states the circumstances of the appeal. (See State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Quesenberry, 1963, 72 N.M. 291, 383 P.2d 255.)

Although stated by appellant as four separate points, there are really only two questions to be determined. Initially, appellant strongly urges that the district…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moseley v. GarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. People Ex Rel. Euziere v. RiceIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. QuesenberryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Middle States Utilities Co. v. City of OsceolaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  5. State Ex Rel. Valley Center Drain District v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Allen v. McClellanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Jones v. New Mexico State Highway DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. LangAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. State Ex Rel. Bureau of Revenue v. MacPhersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API