Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Clark
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided April 8, 1968No. 8447PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge, Court of Appeals.
The property owner sought mandamus to enforce certain provisions of a judgment in a condemnation proceeding. Compare State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Quesenberry, first case — 72 N.M. 291, 383 P.2d 255 (1963) ; second case — 74 N.M. 30, 390 P.2d 273 (1964). The trial court dismissed its alternative writ on the basis that (1) the State Highway Commission did not have a duty to perform the act sought to be compelled by mandamus and (2) the property owner had a plain, speedy and adequate remedy at law. The appeal raises the same issues.
The State, on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kiddy v. Board of County Com'rs of Eddy CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Sender v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- La Luz Community Ditch Co. v. Town of AlamogordoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. QuesenberryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Sun Co. v. VigilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pope v. Gap, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Owen v. Burn Construction Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Hillis v. MeisterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- In Re New Mexico Properties, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1982
- United States v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.