Legal Opinion
Underwood Typewriter Co. v. City of Hartford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 27, 1923PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurpee, J.
The question first presented to the Superior Court was whether the plaintiff j as it alleged in its application, was aggrieved by the action of the board of relief of the defendant'city. General Statutes, § 1240. The action specified was its refusal to reduce the valuation of the plaintiff’s main factory plant which the city tax assessors had made. Having heard' the parties, the court found that the valuation was excessive, and that the refusal of the board of relief was erroneous. Consequently the plaintiff was aggrieved, and had the right to call upon the Superior Court to exercise its…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. WestenhaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Greenwoods Co. v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
3Cited by53 opinions
- Kaiser Co. v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Sibley v. Town of MiddlefieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Somers v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Burritt Mutual Savings Bank v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.