W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Hoffman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action to recover an indebtedness of defendant Hoffman, guaranteed by defendants Johnson, Bye and Bostrom, who will be referred to for convenience as defendants, there having been no appearance by Hoffman. A verdict was directed against defendants and after the denial of their alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial, they appeal from the judgment.
Plaintiff is an Illinois corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of patent medicines. Plaintiff’s claim against Hoffman arose under a “renewal contract” with him, designating him as the buyer and plaintiff as the seller…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- J. R. Watkins Medical Co. of Winona v. CoombesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Saginaw Medicine Co. v. BateyMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Lieb Packing Co. v. TrockeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Atkinson v. NashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- National Surety Co. v. BecklundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Watkins Products, Inc. v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Sager v. W .T. Rawleigh Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1929
- Standard Surety & Casualty Co. v. OlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Schlozer v. HeckerothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.