Nutritional Health Alliance v. Shalala
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
OWEN, District Judge.
Americans spend approximately $3.5 billion a year on vitamins and other dietary supplements, with more than 120 million people taking them regularly. Under the current federal regulatory scheme, retailers and manufacturers are prohibited from making any “health claim” 1 or “disease claim” on the labels of these vitamins -unless there is a Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) determination that there is “significant scientific agreement” that the claim is valid. Until the mid-1980’s there were virtually no health claims on labels because an even stricter…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Carmen Gonzalez v. Orville L. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Heckler v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nutritional Health Alliance v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Washington Legal Foundation v. FriedmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Pearson v. ShalalaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Western States Medical Center v. ShalalaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1999
- Consumer Justice Center v. Olympian Labs, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.