Legal Opinion
Heckler v. Day
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 22, 1984No. 82-1371PublishedCited by 193 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Powell
The question presented is the validity of an injunction issued on behalf of a statewide class that requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to adjudicate all future disputed disability claims under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U. S. C. §401 et seq., according to judicially established deadlines and to pay interim benefits in all cases of noncompliance with those deadlines.
h-H
Title II of the Social Security Act (Act) was passed m 1935. 49 Stat. 622, as amended, 42 U. S. C. §401 et seq. Among other things, it provides for the payment of disability insur-*106anee benefits to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by193 opinions
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ingram v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.