Legal Opinion
Washington Legal Foundation v. Friedman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 30, 1998No. Civil Action 94-1306(RCL)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration of the memoran-da filed in support of and in opposition to the respective motions, the relevant legal authorities, and the entire record, and finding that there is no genuine issue of material fact, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment will be granted and defendants’ cross-motion will be denied.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Washington Legal Foundation (‘WLF”) is a nonprofit public interest law and policy center that defends “the rights of…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Richardson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Washington Legal Foundation v. HenneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- US Ex Rel. Bennett v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- United States Ex Rel. Nowak v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.