Legal Opinion

Consumer Justice Center v. Olympian Labs, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 2002No. G027973PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SILLS, P. J.

I. Introduction

Consumer Justice Center, a nonprofit entity, has filed a complaint under the California’s unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.) against the makers and distributors of two over-the-counter dietary supplements. Consumer Justice seeks injunctions to remove the products from the market altogether, alternatively to change the advertising of the products, and to have all the profits made from the products disgorged.

One of the supplements is “Medi-Phen,” which is a combination of green tea extract, garcinia cambogia, ginger, mustard seed,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farm Raised Salmon CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Simpson v. Kroger Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Southern California Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. J.J v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
  5. Opinion No. (2005), California Attorney General Reports2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API