Legal Opinion
Century 21 Real Estate Corp. v. Re/Max South County
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 20, 1994No. MDL No. 1008. No. SA CV 93-567 AHS (EEx)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING THOMAS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART RE/MAX INTERNATIONAL, INC.’S AND BYME, INC.’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON ALL CLAIMS
STOTLER, District Judge.
I
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The Court has received full briefing and entertained oral argument on three motions brought by the parties to this litigation. On June 6, 1994, plaintiff Century 21 Real Estate Corporation (“Century 21”) filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Defendants filed opposition on July 5, 1994. On July 8, 1994, the Court stayed the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Mullis v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Pebble Beach Co. v. Tour 18 I, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
- Tire Kingdom, Inc. v. Morgan Tire & Auto, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
- Haskell v. Time, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1997
- Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. v. Nutro Products, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Yumul v. Smart Balance, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.