Bunn v. Lucas, Pino & Lucas
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.
The two appellants and the four respondents in this case are lawyers. Their unfortunate controversy involves disputed rights with respect to the substantial attor neys fees which were earned by the rendition of professional services in certain contested probate proceedings. These six lawyers collaborated successfully in representing the interests of a client who claimed a major share of a very large estate. At the outset the client had retained respondents Lucas, Pino, Lucas and Wicks to act as her attorneys pursuant to a contingent fee agreement. Thereafter, respondents, deeming it prudent…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Spencer v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Lasry v. LedermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Campagna v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Chambers v. KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Simmons v. WareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- California Steel Buildings, Inc. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Dwyer v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.