Legal Opinion

James v. Nolan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 9, 1992No. 1944PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, President Judge:

In this appeal from the judgment entered on the jury verdict in favor of appellee Maeve Nolan, M.D., and Firm Labs Service, P.C. (hereinafter “appellees”), appellant Rodney James (hereinafter “appellant”) seeks a new trial based on his contention that the trial court erred in several respects and that the jury’s verdict was inconsistent with the law and the facts of this case. The following four issues have been raised for our consideration: (1) whether the jury’s finding that appellee was negligent but that her negligence was not a substantial factor in causing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Fish v. GosnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Lilley v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Geyer v. SteinbronnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Giovanetti v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hightower-Warren v. SilkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Soderberg v. WeiselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Takes v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Takes v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. HarveySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API