Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Harvey

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1995PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether a witness’s testimony that he consumed a particular brand of beer, based upon the label of the container, constitutes inadmissible hearsay. In addition, we consider whether the Commonwealth may establish the alcohol content of a malt or brewed beverage by taking judicial notice that certain brands of such beverages are listed in the Pennsylvania Bulletin as containing at least 0.5% alcohol by volume. Because we find that there was no violation of the hearsay rule and that judicial notice was properly taken, we affirm the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Edwin MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. HaberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. RushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. In the Interest of D.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ledford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Sherin v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  3. Ledford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Ledford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. State v. GuerraIdaho Supreme Court · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API