Legal Opinion

Pascucci v. Rossi

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 1, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by the indorsee against the maker and indorser of a promissory note, brought to and tried by the City Court of New Haven, Booth, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for $392, and appeal by the defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtRoraback, J.

The plaintiff’s cause of action is described in his complaint as follows: "On February 1, 1916, the defendant A. T. Rossi made his note dated on that day and thereby promised to pay to the order of one Isadore W. Resnik, attorney and agent of the plaintiff, the sum of $380, three months after date, at The Mechanics Bank, New Haven.”

The language of the note, which was introduced in evidence against the objection of the defendant, was this:—

u $380.00 New Haven, Conn., Feb. 1, 1916.

Three months after date I promise to pay to the order of Isadore W. Resnik, three hundred and eighty ($380.00)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. HendricksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  2. Clark v. WoosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mazziotti v. DimartinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Rose v. Van BoschSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API