Clark v. Wooster
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to recover damages for a breach of warranty in the sale of a horse, brought to the District Court of Waterbury and tried to the jury before Cowell, J.; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and appeal by the defendant Rogers.
1Opinion of the CourtTorrance, C. J.
The complaint in this case, as it stood when suit was begun, alleged in substance the following facts : The defendants on October 21st, 1902, offered to sell to the plaintiff the horse in question, and both then warranted that it was sound, kind, gentle, and would not balk. Relying upon said warranty the plaintiff' bought said horse and paid to the defendants therefor the sum of $125. At the time of said warranty said horse was balky, unsound, unkind, and worthless, “all of which was well known by the defendants.”
At the trial of the case the complaint was amended by adding the following…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Plumb v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Porter v. RitchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Shupe v. CollenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
- Bartholomew v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
- Trumbull v. O'HaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Banks v. WatrousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Jacobson v. HendricksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Pascucci v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917