Brunhild v. . Freeman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil ActioN tried at January Special Term, 1877, of New Hanover Superior Court, before McKoy, J. The case is sufficiently stated by Mr. Justice Reade in-delivering the opinion of this Court. Verdict and judgment for plaintiffs. Appeal by defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtReads, J.
The plaintiff sold goods to one Mayer to the amount of $415, and took from Mayer as collateral security' therefor eight notes for $125 each, which Mayer held upon* the defendant. The 'defendant subsequently gave to the; plaintiff on account of the transaction four notes for $100’ each, and this action is upon one of these four new notes. And. the plaintiff had a verdict and judgment. This is all plain* enough, but the defendant says that at the time when he gave the plaintiff the lour new notes, it was upon the understanding that the eight old notes were to be delivered up to-him by the…
2Cited by27 opinions
- McCain v. Hartford Live Stock InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Prince v. . McRaeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Roberta Manufacturing Co. v. Royal Exchange Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- N. & W. Overall Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Bailey v. . RutjesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.