Anderson v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.*
This is an appeal from a postconviction petition, filed under Minn. R.Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 9, as a motion to correct a restitution award. Appellant argues that the district court was required to correct an earlier sentencing order that required him to pay $1,000 in restitution under the identity theft statute for each of the 28 direct victims, without a sufficient factual basis determined under statutes that govern an award of restitution. We affirm.
FACTS
In September 2007, appellant Robert Anderson pleaded guilty in Ramsey County to one count of aiding and abetting…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. TenerelliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. CarufelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. StutelbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. LatimerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. AmundsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. ProvostCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota, (A15-0984), (A15-0998) v. Chao Moua, (A15-0984), (A15-0998).Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.