Legal Opinion

Felo v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1943No. Appeals, 34-41PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

These actions in trespass to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by Clara E. Felo and her three minor children, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendants, Kroger Grocery & Baking Company and Eichard F. Ehrler, were instituted by Andrew and Clara E. Felo in their own right and by the former as guardian of the minor children. The jury returned verdicts against the Kroger company but in favor of Ehrler in each case. Motions for a new trial were filed by the Kroger company and, after argument, were discharged by the learned court below on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MellonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Trerotola v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Medvidovich v. SchultzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Hornick v. Bethlehem Mines Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Theisen v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Jones Et Vir v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Frank v. W. S. Losier Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Susser v. WileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API