Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. Yellow Cab Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1959No. Appeals, 319, 320, 322, 323, 324 and 325PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Benjamin E. Jones,

Eva Rodgers and her husband, Raymond H. Rodgers, the appellees, instituted a trespass action against the Yellow Cab Company (herein called Yellow Cab), one of appellants, to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained by Mrs. Rodgers when a taxicab in which she was a passenger was driven into an excavation at the southeast corner of 33rd Street and Woodland Avenue, Philadelphia. The Yellow Cab Company joined as additional defendants the City of Philadelphia, John P. Meehan & Son, (herein called Meehan), Philadelphia Gas Works, Philadelphia…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Kline v. Moyer and AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Littman v. Bell Tel. Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Hughes v. Pittsburgh Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. DeLuca v. Manchester Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Kite v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Eric McNello v. John B. Kelly, Inc. v. B. J. Lucarelli and Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  2. Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Green v. Independent Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Pachesky v. GetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. DeAngelis v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API