Legal Opinion
Gustavo Castellon-Contreras v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 10, 1995No. 94-2089PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Gustavo Castellon-Contreras (“Castellon-Contreras”) appeals the Board of Immigration Appeal’s affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s determination that Castel-lon-Contreras did not have seven years of lawful unrelinquished domicile, thereby making him ineligible for discretionary relief from deportation. Although we disagree with the Board of Immigration Appeal’s legal analysis, we agree with its conclusion and thus affirm.
I
Castellon-Contreras, a citizen of Mexico, came to the United States illegally in 1979 or 1980 and has continued living here since that time.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Elkins v. MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Tim Lok v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Enrique Cuevas-Gaspar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Lake v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Francisca Elena Ortega De Robles v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Time Warner Cable v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Frank Thomas v. Law Firm of Simpson & CybakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.