Legal Opinion
Francisca Elena Ortega De Robles v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 2, 1995No. 93-70461PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAMUEL P. KING, District Judge:
Petitioner Francisca Elena Ortega de Robles petitions from an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying her application for discretionary relief under sec tion 212(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(e). The BIA determined that Petitioner did not qualify for consideration for § 212(c) relief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a, and grant the petition and remand to the BIA for consideration of such relief.
BACKGROUND
Petitioner is a married lawful permanent resident alien. Her husband and daughter are also lawful…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Melesio Manuel Tapia-Acuna v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Tim Lok v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Bautista Castillo-Felix v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- MacArio Bonilla v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Enrique Cuevas-Gaspar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- SORIANOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco JIMENEZ-MARMOLEJO, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Lopez-VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.