Legal Opinion

Young v. Zavitz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1961No. Docket 57, Calendar 48,880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Plaintiffs filed a bill of complaint (September 28, 1959) to rescind a land contract on the ground of fraudulent representation, and defendants Wood filed a cross bill to foreclose the contract. Plaintiffs appeal from a decree dismissing the bill of complaint and allowing foreclosure.

Plaintiffs signed a contract (May 22,1959) to purchase defendants Wood’s Houghton Lake resort property for $31,500, with a down payment of $6,000, the balance to be paid $3,000 annually with interest.

Plaintiffs took possession of and operated the resort during the summer of 1959. Plaintiffs’ letter of rescission…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barnard v. HuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Drysdale v. P. J. Christy Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Smith v. TaberMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Bedford v. TetzlaffMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dumas v. HelmMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Larson v. PittmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Russo v. WolbersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Benincasa v. MihailovichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API