Legal Opinion
Baufield v. Warburton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 21, 1930No. 28,127PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.
Defendants appeal from an order denying their alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or, if that be denied, then for a new trial.
Plaintiff, Ida Baufield, brought suit to recover damages for personal injuries caused to her by being struck by an automobile driven by one of the defendants upon a paved state highway, and recovered a verdict.
The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict is challenged on two grounds: (1) That the evidence does not sustain the finding that the driver of the car was negligent, or that such negligence, if any, was the proximate cause of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- O'Malley v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- McKnight v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Fairchild v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Steffenson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Tuder v. Oregon Short Line RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carpenter v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Romann v. BenderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Saunders v. Yellow Cab Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Anderson v. EnfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company v. Historic Ivy Tower, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014