State v. Marsala

The defendant appeals from the judgments of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of five counts of stalking in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-181d.1 On appeal, he claims that the trial court improperly (1) allowed the state to amend the *86information on the day jury selection commenced, (2) denied the defendant’s motion in limine to limit the cross-examination of the defendant, (3) allowed the state’s cross-examination of the defendant to exceed the scope of the direct examination, (4) struck the defendant’s entire testimony when he refused to answer certain…