Legal Opinion

Lang v. Windsor Mount Joy Mutual Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 20, 1980No. Civ. A. 80-1377PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

Determining that plaintiff has invoked federal jurisdiction properly constitutes the in limine question which federal courts must consider prior to proceeding to the merits of a claim. Pacific Intermountain Express Co. v. Hawaii Plastics Corp., 528 F.2d 911 (3d Cir. 1976). In the present controversy, resolution of this question requires reference to the capacity of defendant Cloister Relief Association (CRA), an unincorporated association, to be sued as a class under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23.2. 1 The Court dismissed the original action which plaintiff, then…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. United Steelworkers of America v. R. H. Bouligny, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Underwood v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Murray v. SevierDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  2. Amader v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Fleming v. MacK Trucks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Benn v. Seventh-Day Adventist ChurchDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
  5. Northbrook Excess and Surplus Insurance Company v. The Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Association of MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API