In Re Verde River Irr. Etc. Dist.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action brought under the provisions of section 3405, Revised Code of Arizona, 1928, for the purpose of determining the validity of certain bonds issued by the Verde irrigation and power district. Judgment was rendered in the superior court of Maricopa county declaring the bonds in all respects valid obligations of the district, and the matter has been brought before us for review. The suit is one of the type frequently appearing in this court of late years, where all the nominal parties are anxious that the bonds should be declared valid. The usual process is that the proceedings…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davy v. McNeillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
- State ex rel. Utah Savings & Trust Co. v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1908
- Board of Directors v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- City of Amarillo v. W. L. Slayton Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Stokes v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Allison v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. La PradeArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Reichenberger v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Nelssen v. Electrical District No. 4Arizona Supreme Court · 1942
- Mann v. City of ArtesiaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.