Legal Opinion

City of Amarillo v. W. L. Slayton Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 5, 1919No. 1463PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHu'Fe, C. J.

Prior to the 16th day of March, 1917, the city manager of the city of Amarillo published a notice that he would receive sealed bids for two separate paving bond issues, one for $10,000 and the other for $40,000, requiring the bidders to tender with their bids certified checks, one for $200 and the other for $800. Slayton & Co., of Toledo, Ohio, having learned of such notice, after considerable correspondence submitted the following proposition:

“M. C. Hardin, City Mgr., Amarillo, Texas.
“Dear Sir: Eor $10,000 paving bonds to be issued by the city of Amarillo, Texas, to bear date of March 14th,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Moore, Country Judge v. CoffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Grayson County v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Flanagan v. FoxNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  4. Church v. ShanklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Simpson v. City of NacogdochesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Dixie Oil Co. v. McBurnettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. Smith v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. Municipal Securities Corp. v. Buhl Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Sweet v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API