Legal Opinion
Sands Regent v. Valgardson
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 1989No. 18887PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Terminated after a shift manager explained that they were “too old,” Valgardson and Metzer filed an action against appellants (the Sands) seeking both compensatory and punitive damages. Following a jury verdict and judgment entered in respondents’ favor, the Sands has appealed, urging, inter alia, that the calculation of damages below was in error. On cross-appeal, Valgardson and Metzer also claim that the damages calculus is incorrect and specifically take issue with the lower court’s remittitur of punitive damages. Additionally, Metzer and Valgardson claim that Pete Cladianos should…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Emra Joseph Bonham v. Dresser Industries, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Hansen v. Harrah'sNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- K Mart Corp. v. PonsockNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Fawcett v. G. C. Murphy & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by74 opinions
- Pitts v. Terrible Herbst, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- D'Angelo v. GardnerNevada Supreme Court · 1991
- Tammie Ackelson v. Manley Toy Direct, L.L.C. And Toy Network, L.L.C. v. Manley Toy Direct, L.L.C.. And Toy Network, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Jeanne P. Herman v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local Union No. 971Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Shoen v. Amerco, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1995
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.