Blassingame v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action for back pay, brought by a former enlisted man in the Marine Corps. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the complaint demonstrates that the action is untimely. The matter is fully briefed, and oral argument is deemed unnecessary. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.
*505BACKGROUND
On June 18, 1971, Mr. Blassingame, a private first class, received an undesirable discharge from the Marine Corps. His efforts to have the discharge corrected before the Naval Discharge Review Board and the Board of Corrections for Naval Records…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kirby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Brundage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Michael G. Hurick v. The Honorable John Lehman, Secretary of the U.S. NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Cason v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Marlin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Schweitzer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Simmons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Osborn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- McNeil v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.